Renowned for his advocation of living a more spiritual life emphasizing meditation to embrace our interconnectedness with the universe, Deepak Chopra has taken a more decidely political stance recently.
Admittedly, I never really paid too much attention to Deepak because he was on Oprah's show so much. That alone was off-putting. Oprah Winfrey has enough pretension to fill the universe, never mind leaving any space for the unlightened hoi polloi like you and me to find a small corner to interconnect with.
Besides, she brought us that insufferable, loudmouth Dr. Phil and was the pied piper of misinformation in her slavering endorsement of James Frey's fraudulent 'A Million Little Pieces,' facts and reality be damned. For all her bullshit talk, she still can't see past colour. Her behaviour during the recent US election was embarrassing and it was evident to me this woman actually thought American voters would actually care about, never mind be influenced by, which candidate she endorsed.
And it burns her ass to no end that she isn't the First Lady. She's still a catty bitch for all her high-falutin' talk of fostering sisterhood, compassion and a broader human understanding.
Ho, sit down. Bitch please. Talk to the hand. You're out of order. Kindly refrain, etc. and so-forth. I'll rein myself back here because I wanted to talk about Chopra's recent opine on the current economic and political climate.
While I agree in principle with much of what he is saying overall, he speaks in quotables. He answers questions with questions. Any time I've heard him speak he generalizes and doesn't propose, or even speculate on, any tangible action. Unfortunately in a day and age of miniscule attention spans and when too many people don't pick up a newspaper or crack a book, the soundbite has its place in getting the message across. Chopra understands this and it works to his advantage. He's popular, without question.
He's also transparently anti-American and there's no question where one of his latest quotables "the mechanization of death," is directed. Sorry, flying two airliners full of people into buildings, similarly full of people, isn't mechanized death? The modality is, even if the formal political and economic framework doesn't exist to support actual state-funded mechanized aggression or warfare. Chopra makes no mention of the tribalistic, medieval-minded maniacs who seek the annihilation of the very societies who give him the forum to spread his message of sweetness and light in.
The guru calls the United States a casino that led the world to economic rack and ruin. Maybe it did, its official foreign policies and covert operations since the end of the Second World War certainly haven't helped. In fact, it could be said that US foreign policy authored a large part of the quagmire that is international relations as they stand today.
That being said, are we all supposed to just cut or stop military spending, join hands and sing 'Kumbaya' while the Eastern world revels in our weakness and surrender (because that is exactly how they would see it) and we're all either dead or our nations turned into giant prison camps as a result? I thought Chopra understood the Eastern mind, being Indian he should. I do, at least to some degree. The degree that I do understand makes it apparent to me that the Eastern and Western worlds think very differently and it's a grievous mistake to many any assumption to the contrary.
Democracy is no more welcome to them as their fundamentalist religion, caste systems, abuse of human rights or communist totalitarianism is to us. Even though they may immigrate by the thousands to Western countries, many show open disdain for our societal ideals and try to dictate the terms of their inclusion: what they require of us so that they will participate in our societies. The concept of "When in Rome..."is lost on more than just a few. The more socially liberal nations like Canada, Britain, Holland and the countries of Scandinavia are finding this out the hard way.
What the Western nations have to wake up and realize is that the Near and Far Eastern world doesn't want the theory we're advocating: what they want is our conversion or annihilation as is the case with the Islamic neo-crusaders or; our economic markets and most importantly, our natural resources - both of which China is currently enjoying on what I'm sure is a smaller scale than it would like. North Korea? Who the hell knows what it wants but we can't forget about Japan and Australia floating out there all by themselves, nevermind South Korea.
Deepak Chopra is peddling the politically correct America-bashing that I find repugnant. The current state of the world is a sum of its parts, the US being only one. There's lots of blame to go around so by all means, spread the manure. Things grow best that way, maybe peace can too.
I'll leave you with an excerpt of the Chopra interview article from the Toronto Star:
STUART LAIDLAW
FAITH AND ETHICS REPORTER
In these troubled times, prosperity won't be found in bailout plans or economic stimulus packages, renowned spiritualist Deepak Chopra says.
It will be found in a much more personal commitment to building a better world, he says.
In fact, it all starts with a little quiet, reflective time.
"There will be a new economy," Chopra says in a telephone interview from Halifax, "but the old one has to die first."
Chopra, who speaks in Toronto tonight at Roy Thomson Hall, says the old economy was fuelled by greed and hubris, and could not survive.
"We spent money we did not have on things we did not need to impress people who did not matter," he says.
Bailout plans, he says, aim to revive that old economy, and that's a mistake.
"It was a casino. The U.S.A. led it, and the rest followed."
Better, Chopra says, to focus our spending and production on things that society really needs.
Deciding what that is, he says, begins with some personal reflection on what matters most to us, and dropping whatever we don't need or whatever we buy simply to impress – or keep up with – others.
"We have to change within to change the world outside," says Chopra. "The world mirrors what is in us."
Chopra says he would like see money directed away from defence and armaments, pointing out that the United States alone has the ability to destroy the world several times over.
"Once is enough," he deadpans.
Better, he says, to shift our creative energy away from building new weapons or complicated financial products that few can understand – and that many blame for the current economic downturn – and channel it toward finding new sources of energy and medical breakthroughs.
"We have so much creativity and it's not being harnessed," he says. "What kind of mind harnesses mechanized death?"
The comments mark part of Chopra's recent shift to be more political in his public statements.
Baho, I agree in full with everything you said. The implication (by Chopra and so many others) that we need to just reach out and play nice with terrorists is frustrating, to say the least. It's a shitty position to be in, really. On one hand, we don't want to appear weak, but on the other, any aggression on our part will only reinforce the the notion that we're a bunch of arrogant bullies. As someone who's smack dab in the middle, politically speaking, I can understand both sides, but ultimately, I fear for my children's safety. I want our government to protect them and keep the "bad guys" at bay. It's terrifying to think that someday, I'll have to let them navigate the world on their own. This eventuality keeps me up at night, and my oldest is only three years old.
ReplyDeleteWouldn't it be nice if worldwide love and understanding really was a plausible goal? Sadly, I've come to accept the fact that it will never happen. At least not on a grand enough scale to put even the slightest dent in the number of atrocities committed by human hands.
OK, I'll shut up now, lol.
The moderate viewpoint doesn't mean one is a fence-sitter despite what people on either end of the spectrum might say.
ReplyDeleteI firmly believe that sometimes, peace does indeed come from the barrel of a gun.
For people of conscience like us, that sucks but that's the reality.
I think too Codzilla that you are very brave being a Mom in today's world. My niece just had her 3rd birthday and I honestly don't know how my sister does it. I would have a nervous breakdown with worry, 24/7. I can see too, just with my niece's arrival that my politics have changed accordingly. I'm a lot more realistic than I was. I'm also a lot more hopeful, odd as that may sound.
My post-children politics have also become more realistic. It's interesting how concern for one's own safety becomes far less important when a child you love comes into play. It also makes the suffering of children everywhere absolutely unbearable.
ReplyDeleteYour comment about hope really made me think. Because despite the gloomy sentiments expressed in my first post, I really want to try and pass along the idea that "you CAN make a difference if you try" to my boys. I'd never forgive myself if I raised them to believe that attempting change for the better is a futile effort. Maybe as the world continues to get smaller in terms of accessibility, the younger generations will do away with the prejudices that were established before them. Maybe they'll take the eco-friendly trend and actually make real changes to see it through.
As proof of this possibility, I'd like to take a moment to brag a little about my precious nephew, Mark. He's 18 (I'm a product of my Dad's second marriage so am quite a bit younger than my siblings), and he's an environmental studies major at the University of Georgia. He's nearly finished with his sophomore year, but already he's spearheaded a host of environmental-related efforts, like gathering volunteers to position themselves around the parking lots during college sporting events, who then collect any recyclables the tailgaters would normally just toss in the trash. Mark's efforts recently earned him a scholarship. Here's the article if you're interested: http://www.uga.edu/news/artman/publish/090408_Udall.shtml
Wow, that went on forever, didn't it? Sorry for the utter lack of humility in regards to Mark, but I'm just bursting with pride and I felt his story was a sign that the hope you referred to is absolutely justified.
Environmental Studies is a discipline whose time has come. Innis college at UofT was the home to what started as the small Environmental Studies program before it grew almost exponentially, became the Centre for Environment and moved to a different building. Your nephew has probably heard of it since that circle is still relatively small. It's definitely not like English Lit, LOL!
ReplyDeleteI read the article, what a wonderful achievement and you've every right to be proud. Mark sounds to me like he would be a fantastic prof -inspirational- and they're the best kind :-)
I wish him the best of luck with his studies.